A UK study outlines the risks posed by legacy asbestos.


According to a study that was recently published and came from the United Kingdom, legacy asbestos that is still present in residential and commercial construction is more dangerous than anticipated.


Researchers discovered that almost two-thirds of legacy asbestos had aged sufficiently or been damaged sufficiently to allow fibers to become airborne and pose a risk to individuals in what is believed to be the largest study of its kind worldwide.


The National Organization of Asbestos Consultants and the trade group Asbestos Testing and Consultancy completed the study, which included the collection of an estimated one million samples across Great Britain over the course of six months.


Alarming findings were made. This month, the observations were presented at a Parliamentary event in London, highlighting a flawed asbestos management strategy that is comparable to that in the United States.


We weren't looking for this, but the numbers stood out when we looked at the data. Jonathan Grant, Chairman of NORAC, stated, "Asbestos left in the buildings as'safe' was actually now in a damaged state." When asbestos is damaged, it may release fibers that can cause irreversible cancer if inhaled, posing a danger to building occupants.


The EPA's Risk Evaluation Key for U.S. Asbestos can cause a number of health issues, including malignant mesothelioma, a cancer that cannot be cured and is almost always brought on by inhaling or eating toxic fibers.


Although asbestos was outlawed in the United Kingdom in 1999, legacy asbestos is still present in the majority of construction projects completed prior to the 1980s, just as it is in the United States.


Despite strict regulations, asbestos is not completely outlawed in the United States. As part of the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States is finishing up its Risk Evaluation for Asbestos.


By the end of 2023, Part 2 of the Risk Evaluation, which deals with legacy asbestos, is expected to be finished. This could result in a complete ban on the harmful mineral and a more comprehensive strategy for dealing with it.


Legacy Asbestos Removal Earlier this year, legislators in the United Kingdom rejected a long-term plan that would have eliminated asbestos from all buildings within 40 years.


The British Occupational Hygiene Society's chief executive officer, Kevin Bampton, stated, "It's an impossible situation." Asbestos removal from a property is frowned upon by developers, landlords of social housing, schools, and hospitals due to its high cost, despite the fact that the currently in place management strategies are clearly ineffective.


The UK has one of the highest rates of mesothelioma diagnosed per capita in the world, with an estimated 2,700 cases diagnosed annually. Asbestos, which was banned more than a decade ago, is currently being phased out of all buildings in some European nations.


The importation of asbestos has decreased dramatically and the mining of asbestos has stopped in the United States more than two decades ago.


All raw asbestos imported into the United States in recent years has been consumed by the chloralkali industry, which uses it to make chlorine in semipermeable diaphragms.


Vehicle friction products, sheet gaskets, brake blocks, and other products made with asbestos are still imported in small quantities. However, legacy asbestos poses the greatest threat to the general public today.


However, the general consensus is that asbestos used in earlier stages of construction poses no threat if not disturbed. In the UK, that theory is currently being seriously questioned.


Legislation that would require an asbestos survey of any commercial or residential building that is being sold if it was constructed prior to 1999 is currently under discussion. “Nobody should be selling a building with a toxic substance hidden in it that the buyer doesn't know about,” Grant stated. All UK schools are currently subject to an ongoing asbestos inspection. We also don't want to put workers or building occupants in danger when we upgrade our homes and heating systems. Applying common sense to asbestos is the same as applying common sense to other dangers.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

MAIN